Nma/2383/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -10, Mumbai v. M/S Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2247 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3414 OF 2009 ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2383 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3416 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-10 ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. ..Respondent. Ms. Padma Divakar for appellant. Mr. Sanjiv Shah i/b. Chitnis & Co. for respondent. P.C. :- CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.DATED : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2011 1.Heard. These Notices of Motion are filed seeking condonation of 192 days delay in filing the appeals. Counsel for the respondent has opposed the Notices of Motion by filing a reply. However, for the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Notices of Motion, we deem it proper to condone the delay. Accordingly, the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2.All the Notices of Motion are disposed off with no order as to costs. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)