In Nma/2391/2009 Of Siyaram Silk Mills Ltd. Mumbai v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr. Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2391 OF 2009IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.4090 OF 2008
Sirayam Silk Mills Ltd.
..Appellant.
V/s.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
..Respondent.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for appellant.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 20TH JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the revenue. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, the motion is allowed. Time to remove office objections is extended by two weeks.
2.Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue