Case Law › High Court › Nma/239/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/239/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Mumbai v. Narendra A. Mehta Mumbai

High Court 06 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

06 Feb 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/239/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Mumbai v. Narendra A. Mehta Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Mrs.Anuradha Mane with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant. PC : CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY,2009. 1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 1702 days delay in filing the main appeal. 2. On perusing the affidavit in support, it appearsthat the approval for filing the appeal was received on7.1.2004 but the appeal was filed on 2.8.2008. Thedelay caused during the period from 7.1.2004 to 2.8.2008is not properly explained. In our view, therefore, thecause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Noticeof motion is therefore dismissed. Consequently appeal dismissed. Certified copy expedited. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.