Nma/2407/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 10 Mumbai v. Colgaate Palmolive India Latd
High Court
20 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2407/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 10 Mumbai v. Colgaate Palmolive India Latd
Date of order
20 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/2407/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 10 Mumbai v. Colgaate Palmolive India Latd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeals are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2407 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1308 OF 2008ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2409 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1316 OF 2008ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2410 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1317 OF 2008ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2413 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1307 OF 2008ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2414 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1309 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.M/s. Colgate Palmolive India Ltd.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.Mr. R. Murlidhar with Rajiv Singhvi i/b. Chitnis & Co. for respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 20TH JULY, 2009
P.C. :
1.The Notice of Motions are filed seeking condonation of 192 days delay in filing the appeals. Admittedly, appeals are barred by limitation. Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner ofCentral Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2.In this view of the matter, the appeals are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs.
3.In view of dismissal of Notice of Motions, the appeal papers be consigned to record.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue