Nma/2424/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Mumbai v. Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd
High Court
26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2424/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Mumbai v. Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd
Date of order
26 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/2424/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ,Mumbai v. Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2424 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1008 OF 2007
The CIT City-VI ..Appellant
V/s.
Goodlass Nerolac Paints Limited ..Respondent
----
Mr.A.D.Kango & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26.02.2008.
PC
1. Considering the cause shown, delay condoned.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1008 OF 2007
1. Considering the judgment of this Court in
Sudarshan Chemicals which has been confirmed by the
Supreme Court, learned Counsel seeks leave to
withdraw the appeal. Motion alongwith Appeal
allowed to be withdrawn. Refund of court fees as
per rules.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue