Case Law › High Court › Nma/243/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/243/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Mumbai v. Mahendra Brother

High Court 06 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

06 Feb 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/243/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Mumbai v. Mahendra Brother, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.243 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2481 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.Mahendra Brother...Respondent. Mrs. Anuradha Mane with P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant. Mr. S.J. Mehta for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 6TH FEBRUARY,2009. PC : 1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 893 days delay in filing the main appeal. 2. On perusing the affidavit in support, it appearsthat the approval for filing the appeal was granted on15.3.2006 but the appeal was filed on 31.7.2008.There isno proper explanation for the delay caused between theperiod from 15.3.2006 to 31.7.2008. In our view,therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficientcause. Notice of motion is therefore dismissed.Consequently appeal dismissed. Certified copy expedited. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.