Nma/2433/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Mass Traders Pvt. Ltd
High Court
03 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2433/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Mass Traders Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
03 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2433/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Mass Traders Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2433 OF 2004IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.989 OF 2004
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2433 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.989 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Mass Traders Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.Kotangale for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
R.V.MORE, JJ.
DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
The learned Counsel for the appellant
produced xerox copy of affidavit of service showing
service on the respondent. None present for the
respondent. There is a delay of 70 days in preferring
the Appeal. Shri M.N.Sangnan, Income Tax Officer has
filed affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion for
condonation of delay setting out the reasons as to why
the Appeal was preferred beyond the period of
limitation. Cause shown would amount to sufficient
cause. Delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the
appeal.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.