Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2433/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2433/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Mass Traders Pvt. Ltd

High Court 03 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2433/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Mass Traders Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
03 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/2433/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Mass Traders Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2433 OF 2004IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.989 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2433 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.989 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Mass Traders Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.A.Kotangale for appellant. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND R.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- The learned Counsel for the appellant produced xerox copy of affidavit of service showing service on the respondent. None present for the respondent. There is a delay of 70 days in preferring the Appeal. Shri M.N.Sangnan, Income Tax Officer has filed affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion for condonation of delay setting out the reasons as to why the Appeal was preferred beyond the period of limitation. Cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. Delay is condoned. Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the appeal. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan