Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2449/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2449/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-5 v. M/S. Marwar Textile (Agency) Ltd

High Court 28 Nov 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2449/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-5 v. M/S. Marwar Textile (Agency) Ltd
Date of order
28 Nov 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/2449/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-5 v. M/S. Marwar Textile (Agency) Ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Decision: Even so considering that the question of law involved in the main appeal is pending in this Court in another proceedings between the same parties, we allow the Motion.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2449 OF 2006 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2449 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD.) NO.1290 OF OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD.) NO.1290 OF OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Marwar Textiles (Agency) Ltd. ..Respondent. Mr.R.G.Bhatt for appellant. Mr.S.J.Mehta for respondent. CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 28TH NOVEMBER, 2006. DATED : 28TH NOVEMBER, 2006. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard Mr.Bhatt in support of this Motion. Mr.Mehta appears for the respondent. Motion seeks condonation of delay of 120 days in filing the appeal. Supporting affidavit is filed giving the explanation that the department was undergoing restructuring. Mr.Mehta appearing for the respondent has opposed the condonation of delay. Even so considering that the question of law involved in the main appeal is pending in this Court in another proceedings between the same parties, we allow the Motion. Delay condoned. That will be on payment of costs of Rs.1,500/- to the respondent. Cost to be paid within 2 weeks. Appeal be numbered. (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (H.L.GOKHALE, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan