Nma/2473/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai,City-9, Mumbai v. M/S Tutkuksrestaurant P.l
High Court
07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2473/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai,City-9, Mumbai v. M/S Tutkuksrestaurant P.l
Date of order
07 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2473/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai,City-9, Mumbai v. M/S Tutkuksrestaurant P.l, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2473 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.728 OF 2003
-----------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s
appearances, Court’s orders
order or directions
-----------------------------------------------------
¦ Mr.B.M.Chatterjee for the
¦ Appellant.
¦
¦
¦ CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
¦ J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
¦ DATED:7TH AUGUST, 2008
P.C.:
The learned Counsel for the
Applicant states that the Respondent
is served. Respondent has not filed
any reply. In the absence of any
reply, accepting the averments made
in the affidavit filed in support of
the Notice of Motion, at their face
value, Motion is granted in terms of
prayer clause (a). Motion disposed
of.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue