Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2480/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2480/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Fidelity Shares And Securities (P) Ltd

High Court 26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2480/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Fidelity Shares And Securities (P) Ltd
Date of order
26 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/2480/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Fidelity Shares And Securities (P) Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2480 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1218 OF 2007 The CIT-3 ..Appellant V/s. M/s.Fidelity Shares & Securities (P) Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.Vimal Gupta and Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistry for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26.02.2008. PC 1. Considering the issue involved in the appeal, we find that the finding is recorded by Commissioner (Appeals) that entire amount of receipt on sale of assets as envisaged under Section 54 EA has been reinvested in specified securities as laid down in section 54 EA which renders these receipts totally exempt from tax. This finding was not disputed in the appeal filed before the Tribunal. 2. Considering the above, the question as framed was purely academic and consequently, appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan