Nma/2480/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Fidelity Shares And Securities (P) Ltd
High Court
26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2480/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Fidelity Shares And Securities (P) Ltd
Date of order
26 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/2480/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Fidelity Shares And Securities (P) Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2480 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1218 OF 2007
The CIT-3 ..Appellant
V/s.
M/s.Fidelity Shares & Securities
(P) Ltd., ..Respondent
----
Mr.Vimal Gupta and Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the
appellant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry for the respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 26.02.2008.
PC
1. Considering the issue involved in the appeal, we
find that the finding is recorded by Commissioner
(Appeals) that entire amount of receipt on sale of
assets as envisaged under Section 54 EA has been
reinvested in specified securities as laid down in
section 54 EA which renders these receipts totally
exempt from tax. This finding was not disputed in
the appeal filed before the Tribunal.
2. Considering the above, the question as framed
was purely academic and consequently, appeal
dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.