Nma/2521/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. Vijayshree Reality Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
High Court
18 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2521/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. Vijayshree Reality Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
18 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2521/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9, Mumbai v. Vijayshree Reality Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2521 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2131 OF 2008.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office :
Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances,Court ’s :
orders or directions & :
Prothonotary’s orders. :
------------------------------------------------------------
Mr J. S. Saluja, Advocate for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 18TH DECEMBER, 2008.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant.
2. Perused Notice of Motion and affidavit in support
thereof.
3. For the reasons stated in the Notice of Motion
and affidavit in support thereof sufficient cause is
made out for condoning delay of 231 days in filing
the above appeal. There is no case of inaction,
negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the
appellant-applicant. Hence, the notice of motion is
made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.