Nma/2588/2006 Of The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Reliance Industries Ltd
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2588/2006 Of The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Reliance Industries Ltd
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/2588/2006 Of The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. Reliance Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2588 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1610 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income tax..Appellant Mumbai
V/s.
Reliance Industries Ltd...Respondent
Ms.Poonam Bhosale, Mr.B.M.Chatterji andMr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, for Appellant Mr.Raj Darak, Advocate, for Respondent
P.C.
.This is a Notice of Motion for condoning adelay of 601 days in filing of the main appeal.The Notice of Motion has been carelessly draftedand the number of days of delay is not evenmentioned. Perusal of the affidavit indicatesthat the file was sent to the Law Ministry fordrafting an appeal memo on 6[th] April, 2004 and thedraft memo of appeal was received on 20[th] October,2005. A period of one year and six months for
drafting the appeal memo cannot be said to bereasonable. In our view, the cause shown does notamount to sufficient cause. Hence, the Notice ofMotion stands dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.