Nma/2599/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 Mumbai v. M/S. R.d. Ashar
High Court
29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2599/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 Mumbai v. M/S. R.d. Ashar
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2599/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 Mumbai v. M/S. R.d. Ashar, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2599 of 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1385 of 2006
Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs,.
M/s.R.D. Ashar ..Respondent
Mr. A.S. Rao with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant
Mr. B.V. Jhaveri for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 29TH JANUARY 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 29TH JANUARY 2008
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 565 days in preferring
the Appeal. There is an affidavit in support of the
Motion. The Order of the I.T.A.T. dated 25th June, 2004 was received by the CIT-12 on 14th September, 2004. After other steps, scrutiny report was called
for on 9th December, 2004. The file was sent to
Panel Counsel on 16th December, 2004. The draft
appeal was received on 22nd December, 2005.
Thereafter, note for Court Fees stamp was sent in
January, 2006. There is absolutely no explanation
whatsoever for the delay between 16th December, 2004
and 22nd December, 2005. Considering the cause
shown, in our opinion, the same would not amount to
sufficient cause. Hence Motion is dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.