Case Law › High Court › Nma/2608/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Nma/2608/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bajaj Auto Ltd

High Court 26 Mar 2003 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

26 Mar 2003

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nma/2608/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-3, Mumbai v. M/S. Bajaj Auto Ltd, the High Court (2003) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. NOTICE OF MOTION No. 2608/2003.IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) No.724/2003. The Commissioner of Income-taxMumbai City-IIIAayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road,Mumbai-400 - 020.M/s. Bajaj Auto Ltd.Bombay Pune Road,Akurli, Pune-411 035. ..Appellant. Vs. ..Respondent. Mr Ashok Kotangale with P.S. Sahadevan forthe Appellant. Ms Vasanti B. Patel for the Respondent. CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNANAND V.C. DAGA,JJ.DATED:26TH MARCH, 2007. P.C.:- the appellant. Hence, the notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.