Nma/261/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai v. A. Himashu And Co
High Court
09 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/261/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai v. A. Himashu And Co
Date of order
09 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/261/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Mumbai v. A. Himashu And Co, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ASNIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.261 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO. 2603 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.A. Himashu & Co...Respondent.Mrs. Anuradha Mane for the Appellant.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 9TH FEBRUARY,2009.PC :1. This is a notice of motion for condonation of 1235days delay in filing the main appeal.2. On perusing the affidavit in support, it appearsthat the approval for filing the appeal was granted on18.3.2005 but the appeal came to be filed three yearsand five months later, on 5.8.2008.The delay between theperiod 18.3.2005 and 5.8.2008 has not been properlyexplained. In our view, therefore, the cause shown doesnot amount to sufficient cause. Notice of motion istherefore, dismissed. Consequently appeal dismissed.Certified copy expedited.(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue