Nma/2634/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Shilpa Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd
High Court
16 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2634/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Shilpa Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
16 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2634/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/S. Shilpa Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2634 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1505 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2634 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1505 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Shilpa Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale and P.S.
Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
None for the respondent, though served. Affidavit of
service is filed. Perused the affidavit filed in
support of the Notice of Motion. The Motion is filed
for condonation of 125 days delay in filing the above
appeal. Sufficient cause is shown for condoning the
delay. There is no case of inaction, negligence or
want of bonafide on the part of the appellant. Notice
of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause
(a). Appeal be numbered.
2. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly
with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.