Nma/2636/2003 Of The Director Of Income- Tax,(International Taxation) v. M/S Deutsche Bank A.g
High Court
09 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2636/2003 Of The Director Of Income- Tax,(International Taxation) v. M/S Deutsche Bank A.g
Date of order
09 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/2636/2003 Of The Director Of Income- Tax,(International Taxation) v. M/S Deutsche Bank A.g, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2636 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 7944 OF 2003
The Director of Indocme-tax,
(International Taxation), Mumbai. ... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Deutsche Bank A.G., Mumbai. ... Respondent.
Ashok Kotangale for the appellant.
B.D.Damodar i/b. Kanga & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 9th April 2007.
DATED : 9th April 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel for the appellant
and learned counsel for the respondent.
2. By this notice of motion, appellant seeks
to condone delay of 154 days in filing appeal.
3. Perused notice of motion and affidavit in
support thereof. For the reasons stated therein
sufficient cause is made out for condoning delay in
filing appeal. There is no case of inaction,
negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the
appellant. Hence notice of motion is made absolute
in terms of prayer clause (a).
4. Place the appeal on board on 16th April
2007 for admission.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue