Nma/2645/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Reliance Consultancy Services P. Ltd
High Court
28 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2645/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Reliance Consultancy Services P. Ltd
Date of order
28 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/2645/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 Mumbai v. M/S. Reliance Consultancy Services P. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ASN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2645 OF 2007
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1182 OF 2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------Office notes, office Memorandaof Coram, appearance, Court’sorders or directions andRegistrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------Mr.Vimal Gupta and P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry with Raj Darak for theRespondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 28th March,2008.
P.C.
1. As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4.00lakhs, the learned counsel seeks leave towithdraw the Motion along with the Appeal.Motion along with Appeal dismissed as
withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per rules.
Certified copy expedited.
2.The question of law, if any, is kept
open for consideration in appropriate case.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue