Nma/2660/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-16 Mumbai v. M/S. Lunar Gems
High Court
29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2660/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-16 Mumbai v. M/S. Lunar Gems
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/2660/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-16 Mumbai v. M/S. Lunar Gems, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2660 of 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1453 of 2006
Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
Vs,.
M/s.Lunar Gens ..Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant
Mr.Paras S. Savla with Mr. Ajay R. Singh
for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 29TH JANUARY 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 29TH JANUARY 2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. We have considered the affidavit in support.
We do not find that the same amounts to sufficient
cause. Even otherwise the tax incidence is less
than Rs.4.00 lakhs. In the light of that Motion
dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue