Case Law › High Court › Nma/2664/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2664/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 Mumbai v. M/S. Fortune Steel Industries

High Court 24 Jan 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

24 Jan 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nma/2664/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 Mumbai v. M/S. Fortune Steel Industries, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2664 OF 2010IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6765 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-18, Mumbai ..... Appellants V/s.M/s.Fortune Steel Industries..... Respondents ---- Mr.A.S.Shivsharan for the appellants. Ms.V.B.Patel for the respondents. ---- CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE :24/1/ 2011 P.C. 1.By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses-(a) & (b). Appeal is restored to file. Notice of Motion is disposed off. (MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.