Nma/2692/2011 Of Ravindranath S. Doodi (Huf) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle -35
High Court
17 Oct 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2692/2011 Of Ravindranath S. Doodi (Huf) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle -35
Date of order
17 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2692/2011 Of Ravindranath S. Doodi (Huf) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle -35, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2692 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1124 OF 2011ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2693 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.1123 OF 2011
Ravindranath S. Doddi (HUF)
..Appellant.
V/s.
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle35, Mumbai & Anr.
..Respondents.
Mr. Jitendra Singh for the appellant.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the respondents.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND K.K. TATED, JJ.
DATED : 17TH OCTOBER, 2011
P.C. :-
1.By consent, Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms for prayer clause A.
2.The Notices of Motion are disposed off accordingly with no
order as to costs.
(K.K. TATED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue