Nma/2705/2004 Of The Commissioner O Income-Tax v. M/S Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co.ltd
High Court
24 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2705/2004 Of The Commissioner O Income-Tax v. M/S Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co.ltd
Date of order
24 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/2705/2004 Of The Commissioner O Income-Tax v. M/S Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2705 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1123 OF 2004
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2705 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1123 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :-
The delay is of 499 days. From the
affidavit in support of the Motion, it is see that the
file was sent to the Ministry of Law on 2/5/2003 and it
was received only around 1/3/2004 and the appeal is
filed on 15/9/2004. The last date of filing the appeal
was 5/5/2003. There is absolutely no reason explaining
the delay between 2/5/2003 to 29/2/2004 as also between
1/3/2004 and 14/9/2004. The reasons given are
insufficient man power and heavy pressure of work, in
our opinion would not amount to sufficient cause.
Hence motion is dismissed.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.