Case Law › High Court › Nma/271/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Nma/271/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16 Mumbai v. M/S. Zadaphia Brothers

High Court 10 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Feb 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/271/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16 Mumbai v. M/S. Zadaphia Brothers, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ASNIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.271 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2485 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax-16...Appellant.Vs.M/s. Zadaphia Brothers...Respondent.Mrs.Anuradha Mane for the Appellant.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY,2009.PC :1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 568-daysdelay in filing the main appeal.2. On perusing the affidavit in support, it appearsthat the approval for filing the appeal was granted on4.1.2007 but the appeal came to be filed more than oneyear and six months later, on 31.7.2008. The delaycaused between the period 4.1.2007 and 31.7.2008 has notbeen properly explained. In our view, therefore, thecause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Noticeof motion is therefore, dismissed. Consequently appeal dismissed. Certified copy expedited. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.