Nma/2717/2004 Of The Commissiojer Of Income-Taxcity-Xvi,Mumbai v. Ramshkumr Manishkumr And Co
High Court
24 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2717/2004 Of The Commissiojer Of Income-Taxcity-Xvi,Mumbai v. Ramshkumr Manishkumr And Co
Date of order
24 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/2717/2004 Of The Commissiojer Of Income-Taxcity-Xvi,Mumbai v. Ramshkumr Manishkumr And Co, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2717 OF 2004IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD.) NO.1130 OF 2004
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2717 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD.) NO.1130 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Rameshkumar Manishkumar & Co. ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for appellant.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 111 days. Considering
the cause shown in the affidavit in support, in our
opinion, the same would amount to sufficient cause.
Hence Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause
(a). Office to register the appeal.
In the event the respondent are not served
and if they are aggrieved by the order, liberty given
to them to apply for recall of this order.
Notice of Motion disposed of with no order
as to costs.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.