Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2717/2004 Of The Commissiojer Of Inc...

Nma/2717/2004 Of The Commissiojer Of Income-Taxcity-Xvi,Mumbai v. Ramshkumr Manishkumr And Co

High Court 24 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2717/2004 Of The Commissiojer Of Income-Taxcity-Xvi,Mumbai v. Ramshkumr Manishkumr And Co
Date of order
24 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/2717/2004 Of The Commissiojer Of Income-Taxcity-Xvi,Mumbai v. Ramshkumr Manishkumr And Co, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2717 OF 2004IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD.) NO.1130 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2717 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD.) NO.1130 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant. V/s. Rameshkumar Manishkumar & Co. ..Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for appellant. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- There is a delay of 111 days. Considering the cause shown in the affidavit in support, in our opinion, the same would amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the appeal. In the event the respondent are not served and if they are aggrieved by the order, liberty given to them to apply for recall of this order. Notice of Motion disposed of with no order as to costs. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan