Nma/27/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Vi, Mumbai v. M/S. Gaxebo Industries Ltd
High Court
11 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/27/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Vi, Mumbai v. M/S. Gaxebo Industries Ltd
Date of order
11 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/27/2004 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Vi, Mumbai v. M/S. Gaxebo Industries Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OFMOTION NO. 27 OF 2004
NOTICE OF
IN
APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 1267 OF 2003
INCOME TAXAPPEAL (LDG.) NO. 1267 OF 2003
INCOME TAX
INCOME TAX
The Commissioner of Income
Tax, Mumbai City-VI ... Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Gaxebo Industries Ltd. ... Respondent.
Ashok Kotangale for the appellant.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 11th June 2007.
DATED : 11th June 2007.
P.C. :
P.C. :----
----
. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None
for the respondent though served.
2. By this notice of motion, appellant seeks
to condone delay of 56 days in filing appeal.
3. Perused notice of motion and affidavit in
support thereof. For the reasons stated therein
sufficient cause is made out for condoning delay in
filing appeal. There is no case of inaction,
negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the
appellant. Hence notice of motion is made absolute
in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue