Nma/273/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Viii, Mumbai v. Arakesh K.arora
High Court
25 Oct 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/273/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Viii, Mumbai v. Arakesh K.arora
Date of order
25 Oct 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/273/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Viii, Mumbai v. Arakesh K.arora, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.273 OF 2003ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.435 OF 2001 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.501 OF 2001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.273 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.435 OF 2001
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.501 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax-VIII ..Appellant.
V/s.
Mr.Rakesh Kumar Arora ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for appellant.
Mr.K.Shivram i/b. K.Gopalfor respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 25TH OCTOBER, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
. Heard. The delay of one day is condoned by
consent of the parties. The Revenue undertaked to remove the office objections within 2 weeks and also undertakes to serve the appeal memo and other annexures
on the respondent-assessee.
2. Needless to mention that failure on the part
of the Revenue to remove the office objections within
the stipulated period, the appeal shall sands
automatically dismissed without reference to this
Court.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue