Nma/2732/2004 Of The Commissione Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Rhino Bags P.ltd
High Court
24 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2732/2004 Of The Commissione Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Rhino Bags P.ltd
Date of order
24 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2732/2004 Of The Commissione Of Income-Tax-3 v. M/S Rhino Bags P.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2732 OF 2004IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD.) NO.1101 OF 2004
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2732 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Rhino Bags P.Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for appellant.
Mr.Raj Darak for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 48 days. In the
affidavit in support, in our opinion, considering the
cause shown, the same will amount to sufficient cause.
Hence Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause
(a). Office to register the appeal.
Notice of Motion disposed of with no order
as to costs.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue