Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2744/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2744/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 Mumbai v. Central Bank Of India

High Court 18 Oct 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2744/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 Mumbai v. Central Bank Of India
Date of order
18 Oct 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/2744/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 Mumbai v. Central Bank Of India, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION N.M.NO.2521/2009IN ITXA NO.1112/2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax.V/s.Bharat Serums and Vaccines Ltd. ... Appellant.... Respondent. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Vasanti Patel for the respondent ITXA NO.735/2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax.V/s.Datamatics Financial. ... Appellant.... Respondent. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. A.K.Jasani for the respondent ANDN.M.NO.2573/2009IN The Commissioner of Income Tax.V/s.Datamatics Ltd. ITXA NO.589/2010... Appellant.... Respondent. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.A.K.Jasani for the respondent ANDN.M.NO.2744/2009IN ITXA NO.2827/2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax.V/s.Central Bank of India. ... Appellant.... Respondent. P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. A.K.Jasani for the respondent 2 AND N.M.NO.2768/2009INITXA NO.775/2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax.V/s.Audco India Ltd. ... Appellant. ... Respondent. P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.A.K.Jasani for the respondent. The Commissioner of Income Tax.V/s. Man Industries India Ltd. ... Appellant.... Respondent. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent. ANDN.M.NO.2853/2009INITXA NO.1075/2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax.V/s.Eurovista Trading Co.Ltd. ... Appellant.... Respondent. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent. DATED : 18[th] October 2010. Appeals have already been disposed of. As such these motions do not survive. All the notices of motion are dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. (R.M.SAVANT, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan