Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2763/2007 Of United Liner Agencies (...

Nma/2763/2007 Of United Liner Agencies (Stevedores) Kaiseer-1,Mum v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Anr

High Court 29 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2763/2007 Of United Liner Agencies (Stevedores) Kaiseer-1,Mum v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Anr
Date of order
29 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nma/2763/2007 Of United Liner Agencies (Stevedores) Kaiseer-1,Mum v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Anr, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2763 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL(LODGING) NO.2796 OF 2006 United Liner Agencies(Stevedores)Kaiser-1, Mumbai. ...Appellant V/s.Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai & Anr. ...Respondents Mrs.Usha I. Dalal for Appellant.Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for Respondents. P.C.:- CORAM : DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ. DATED : 29[th] APRIL, 2008. 1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for theRespondents. By this Notice of Motion, appellant is seeking condonation of111 days delay in filing appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support of Noticeof Motion. Sufficient cause is shown for condoning the delay. There is nocase of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the appellant.Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a). Appeal be numbered. 2.Appeal be listed for hearing in the month of October, 2008 subjectto numbering. 3.Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (A.V. NIRGUDE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan