Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2778/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2778/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Rashi Trading Co.ptd Ltd

High Court 05 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2778/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Rashi Trading Co.ptd Ltd
Date of order
05 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Nma/2778/2005 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Rashi Trading Co.ptd Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2778 OF 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1133 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3..Appellant Mumbai M/s.Rashi Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd...RespondentMumbai Mr.P.S.Sahadevan, Advocate, for Appellant Mr.J.D.Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak, Advocate, forRespondent CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & DATE : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2008 P.C. .This is a Notice of Motion for condoning a delay of 483 days in filing of the main appeal. Onperusal of the affidavit in support we find thatthe permission to file appeal was received on 25[th] March, 2004 and the matter was sent to the Government Counsel for drafting thereafter. Theappeal was however, filed on 16[th] September, 2005. The delay of about two years and six months formerely drafting an appeal memo and filing the same cannot be said to be reasonable. In our view, therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause and hence, the Notice of Motionstands dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan