Nma/278/2006 Of Vishwas Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. Dy Commissioner Of Income-Taxspl. Rg.-1,Kolhapur
High Court
22 Feb 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/278/2006 Of Vishwas Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. Dy Commissioner Of Income-Taxspl. Rg.-1,Kolhapur
Date of order
22 Feb 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/278/2006 Of Vishwas Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd v. Dy Commissioner Of Income-Taxspl. Rg.-1,Kolhapur, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.278 OF 2006IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.714 OF 2004
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.278 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.714 OF 2004
Vishwasrao Naik Sahakari Sakhar
Karkhana Ltd. ..Appellant.
V/s.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ..Respondent.
Mr.P.G.Chavan with S.S.Patwardhan for appellant.
Mr.Prashant Uchil for respondent.
CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2006.
DATED : 22ND FEBRUARY, 2006.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the
appellant is seeking to recall the order passed by the
Prothonotary and Senior Master dismissing the above
appeal on the ground of non removal of office
objections. The learned counsel for the appellant
states that all the office objections have been removed.
. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the
Notice of Motion. Sufficient reasons are made out
therein. There is no case of inaction, negligence or
want of bonafides on the part of the appellant. Hence
Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a) & (b) with no order as to costs.
(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.