In Nma/2785/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-6, Mumbai v. M/S. Hindalco Industries Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2785 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6392 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-6
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Hindalco Industries Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.
Mr. Pankar Toprani for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.DATED : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C. :-
1.By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.Notice of Motion is disposed off with no order as to costs.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue