Case LawHigh Court › Nma/279/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Incom...

Nma/279/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Alpana Samir Chinai

High Court 12 Apr 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/279/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Alpana Samir Chinai
Date of order
12 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/279/2018 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Alpana Samir Chinai, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 279 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 275 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 .. Applicant In the matter betweenPr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2.. Appellant v/s. Alpana Samir Chinai .. Respondent Ms. Swapna Gokhale a/w Mr. Suresh Kumar for the applicant / orig. appellant None for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. P.C. DATED : 12[th ]APRIL, 2018. 1.None appears for the respondent inspite of service. Ms. Gokhale, learned Counsel appearing in support of the application states that the respondent has been served and she undertakes to file affidavit of service on or before 20[th] April, 2018. 2.This motions has been taken up for condonation of 01 day delay in filing the appeal from the order dated 30[th] June, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 3.We have perused the affidavit dated 20[th] March, 2018 of Mrs. Sunita Ramteke, Income Tax Officer and are satisfied with the reasons stated therein for the delay. 4.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan