Nma/2804/2004 Of Mckinsey And Co. Inc v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income-Tax-12
High Court
16 Feb 2006 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2804/2004 Of Mckinsey And Co. Inc v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income-Tax-12
Date of order
16 Feb 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/2804/2004 Of Mckinsey And Co. Inc v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income-Tax-12, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2804 OF 2004 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2804 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1113 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1113 OF 2004
Mckinsey & Co. Inc. ..Appellant.
V/s.
The Joint Commissioner of Income-tax ..Respondent.
Ms.B.Tandon i/b. DSK Legal for appellant.
Mr.E.P.Chopra for respondent.
CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2006.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH FEBRUARY, 2006.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
In view of the disposal of the appeal, the
Notice of Motion does not survive. Hence the same is
dismissed with no order as to costs.
(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue