Nma/2809/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Xiv v. M/S Rajendrakumar And Co
High Court
24 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2809/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Xiv v. M/S Rajendrakumar And Co
Date of order
24 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2809/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Xiv v. M/S Rajendrakumar And Co, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2809 OF 2004ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1146 OF 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2809 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1146 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Rajendrakumar & Co. ..Respondent.
Mr.S.M.Shah i/b.Pankaj Kapoor for appellant.
Mr.S.P. Mehta for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH JULY, 2007.
P.C. :-
There is a delay of 595 days. The last date
for filing the appeal was 3/2/2003. The appeal was
filed on 20th September, 2004. The matter was referred
to the Ministry of Law for drafting the appeal on
31/1/2003. The draft was received on 3/3/2004 and the
appeal has been filed on 20th September, 2004. No
reasons have been given explaining the delay between
31/1/2003 and 3/3/2004 and thereafter between 3/3/2004
and 20th September, 2004. The cause shown, in our
opinion, would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence
Motion is dismissed.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue