Nma/2813/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Mul Healthcare Products Ltd
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2813/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Mul Healthcare Products Ltd
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/2813/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S. Mul Healthcare Products Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Though we have condoned the delay, theappellant is directed to remove the officeobjections, if any, within four weeks from todayfailing which appeal to stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2813 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO.1480 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant Mumbai
V/s.
M/s.Mul Healthcare Products Ltd...RespondentMumbai
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale, Advocate, for Appellant Mr.Atul K. Jasani, Advocate,for Respondent
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO &
DATE : 4TH FEBRUARY, 2008
P.C.
.This is a notice of motion for condonationof 33 days delay in preferring the main appeal. Wehave perused the affidavit in support. Taking intoaccount the facts stated in the affidavit insupport, we propose to accept the cause shown forcondonation of delay subject to levy of costs.Notice of motion is therefore, allowed and the
delay in filing the appeal stands condoned. Officeto number the appeal and list the same foradmission.
2.Though we have condoned the delay, theappellant is directed to remove the officeobjections, if any, within four weeks from todayfailing which appeal to stand dismissed for nonprosecution without further reference to the court.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.