Nma/2819/2003 Of Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation) v. Standards Chartered Bank
High Court
23 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2819/2003 Of Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation) v. Standards Chartered Bank
Date of order
23 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2819/2003 Of Director Of Income-Tax (International Taxation) v. Standards Chartered Bank, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2819/2003 IN ITXA (L) NO.5/2003
(The Director of Income Tax V/s.Standard Chartered Bank)
____________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦
-randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders
Courts orders or directions¦
and Prothonotary’s orders ¦
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE23rd April, 2008
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
: DATE23rd April, 2008
: DATE
: DATE
P.C.:
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant and
Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Mr.Dinesh Vyas for
Respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the
Appellant is seeking condonation of 146
days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal.
For the reasons stated in the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of
Motion, sufficient cause is made out for
condonation of delay, and there is no case
of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide
on the part of the Appellant. Hence, Notice
of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission
in the month of October-2008, subject to
numbering.
(SANTOSH BORA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.