Nma/2822/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 19 , Mumbai v. Shri. Triloksingh P. Rajpal
High Court
30 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2822/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 19 , Mumbai v. Shri. Triloksingh P. Rajpal
Date of order
30 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/2822/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 19 , Mumbai v. Shri. Triloksingh P. Rajpal, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2822/2007 IN ITXA (L) NO.1485/2004
(The CIT Mumbai V/s.Triloksingh P.Rajpal)
____________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦
-randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders
Courts orders or directions¦
and Prothonotary’s orders ¦
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. DATE30th April, 2008P.C.:
A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ.
: DATE30th April, 2008
: DATE
: DATE
P.C.:
. Heard the learned Counsel
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None
appears for the Respondent though served.
By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is
seeking condonation of 836 days’ delay
caused in filing an application for
restoration of an Appeal which was rejected
by the learned Prothonotary & Sr.Master on
8.2.2005 for non-removal of office
objections. It is stated that the delay was
caused due to the process of Annual General
Transfer in the Income Tax Department & the
administrative difficulties etc. However
the said reason does not appear to be
justifiable. No sufficient cause is made
out for condonation of delay caused in
filing the restoration application. Hence,
the Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.