Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2822/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2822/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 19 , Mumbai v. Shri. Triloksingh P. Rajpal

High Court 30 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2822/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 19 , Mumbai v. Shri. Triloksingh P. Rajpal
Date of order
30 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/2822/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 19 , Mumbai v. Shri. Triloksingh P. Rajpal, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2822/2007 IN ITXA (L) NO.1485/2004 (The CIT Mumbai V/s.Triloksingh P.Rajpal) ____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦ -randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders Courts orders or directions¦ and Prothonotary’s orders ¦ -------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. DATE30th April, 2008P.C.: A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. : DATE30th April, 2008 : DATE : DATE P.C.: . Heard the learned Counsel Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondent though served. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 836 days’ delay caused in filing an application for restoration of an Appeal which was rejected by the learned Prothonotary & Sr.Master on 8.2.2005 for non-removal of office objections. It is stated that the delay was caused due to the process of Annual General Transfer in the Income Tax Department & the administrative difficulties etc. However the said reason does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay caused in filing the restoration application. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed. (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan