Case Law › High Court › Nma/284/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of...

Nma/284/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9 v. Gtc Industries Ltd

High Court 13 Apr 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

13 Apr 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Nma/284/2018 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 9 v. Gtc Industries Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.284 OF 2018 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2938 OF 2017WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.285 OF 2018IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2940 OF 2017WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.286 OF 2018IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2932 OF 2017WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.287 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2935 OF 2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-9..Applicant.v/s.GTC Industries Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Tejveer Singh, Advocate for the Applicant/Org. Appellant. Mr. Sameer Dalal, Advocate for the Respondent. P.C:- CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE : 13[th] April, 2018. These four applications seek condonation of delay of 11 days in filing companion appeals from the order dated 31.5.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 2We have perused the affidavit in support dated 15.3.2018 of Mr. V.K.Mangla, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and satisfied with the reasons indicated therein for the delay in filing companion appeals. 3Accordingly, the Notices of Motion are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (SANDEEP K. SHINDE,J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.