Nma/2865/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Silkina Trading Ltd
High Court
09 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2865/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Silkina Trading Ltd
Date of order
09 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/2865/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. M/S Silkina Trading Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2865 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 1463 OF 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes,Office :
Memorandum of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s :
orders or directions :
Prothonotaries orders. :
------------------------------------------------------------
Vimal Gupta with S.R.Chavan
for the appellant.
J.D.Mistry with P.C.Tripathi i/b.
Raj Darak for the respondent.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH ANDV.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH AND
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED: 9th July 2008.
DATED: 9th July 2008.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The respondent has not denied
any averments made in the affidavit filed
in support of notice of motion.
Considering the law laid down by the by
the Supreme Court in relation to the
exercise of powers to condone delay and
also considering that this is a matter of
revenue wherein public interest is
involved, in our opinion, delay has to be
condoned.
2. In the result, motion is granted
in terms of prayer clause (a). Motion
stands disposed of.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.