Nma/2865/2016 Of Union Bank Of India v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu)
High Court
13 Jan 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2865/2016 Of Union Bank Of India v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu)
Date of order
13 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/2865/2016 Of Union Bank Of India v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu), the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: It is also made clear that if the office objections are not removed within two weeks provided herein, the appeal would stand dismissed without reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2865 OF 2016
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. (L) 537 OF 2016
Union Bank of India
.. Applicant
In the matter between
Union Bank of India .. Appellant
v/s.
Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) .. Respondent
Ms. Nupur Awasthi i/b Consulta Juris for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. A.R. Malhotra a/w Mr. N.A. Kazi for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 13[th] JANUARY, 2017.
1.This notice of motion has been taken out for condonation of 47 days delay in filing the accompanied appeal from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 18[th] November, 2015.
2.We have perused the affidavit in support of the notice of motion
and are satisfied with the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the notice of motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A).
3.It is made clear that the office objections, if any, to be removed by the applicant within a period of two weeks from today. It is also made clear that if the office objections are not removed within two weeks provided herein, the appeal would stand dismissed without reference to the Court.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.