Nma/287/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Mumbai v. Aditya Diamonds
High Court
11 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/287/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Mumbai v. Aditya Diamonds
Date of order
11 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/287/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Mumbai v. Aditya Diamonds, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 287OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO. 2580OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant.Vs.Aditya Diamonds...Respondent.Mrs.Anuradha Mane for the Appellant.CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATE : 11TH FEBRUARY,2009.PC :1. This is a notice of motion for condoning 1488 daysdelay in filing the main appeal.2. On perusing the affidavit in support, it appearsthat the approval for filing the appeal was granted on7.7.2004 but the appeal came to be filed more than fouryears later, on 31.7.2008. The delay caused between theperiod 7.7.2004 and 31.7.2008 has not been properlyexplained. In our view, therefore, the cause shown doesnot amount to sufficient cause. Notice of motion istherefore, dismissed. Consequently, appeal dismissed.Certified copy expedited.(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue