Nma/2888/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Mumbai v. M/S. Delta Air Lines, Inc
High Court
16 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2888/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Mumbai v. M/S. Delta Air Lines, Inc
Date of order
16 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/2888/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Mumbai v. M/S. Delta Air Lines, Inc, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2888 OF 2006 IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2888 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.751 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.751 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Delta Air Lines ..Respondent.
Mr.A.D.Kango with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.Jitendra Singh i/b. DSK Legal for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
the learned counsel for the respondent. The Motion is
filed for condonation of 371 days delay in filing the
above appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support
of the Notice of Motion. The order of I.T.A.T. is
dated 3/10/2003. The appeal was filed on 14/6/2005
i.e. after a lapse of about one year. The reasons
given for the delay in filing the appeal is that there
was a delay in receiving the draft appeal memo and
reasons beyond the control of the appellant’s office.
The reasons given are totally unsatisfactory. No case
is made out for condoning the delay. Notice of Motion
is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.