Case LawHigh Court › Nma/2893/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2893/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Mumbai v. M/S. Delta Air Lines, Inc

High Court 01 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2893/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Mumbai v. M/S. Delta Air Lines, Inc
Date of order
01 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nma/2893/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), Mumbai v. M/S. Delta Air Lines, Inc, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2893 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2893 OF 2006 IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.752 OF 2005 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.752 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s.Delta Air Lines Inc. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.Jitendra Jain i/b. DSK Legal for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 1ST APRIL, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. This Notice of Motion is filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 371 days delay in filing the above appeal. Perused the affidavit filed in support of the Notice of Motion. On perusal of paragraph 3 of the said affidavit, we find that the last date for filing the appeal was 9/6/2004. However, the file was sent to Ministry of Law on 12/7/2004 and the file was returned back after almost a year i.e. on 8th June, 2005. The above appeal is filed on 14/6/2005. There is absolutely no explanation as to why it took almost a year for the file to come from the Ministry of Law with the draft appeal memo. There is no sufficient cause shown for condonation of delay. Notice of Motion is dismissed with no order as to costs. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan