Nma/2900/2016 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Killick Nixon Ltd
High Court
23 Dec 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2900/2016 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Killick Nixon Ltd
Date of order
23 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nma/2900/2016 Of Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Killick Nixon Ltd, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: It is made clear that if the Office objections are not removed within 4 weeks, the appeal itself would stand dismissed without any reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2900 OF 2016
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 890 OF 2016
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1.. Applicant In the matter betweenPrincipal Commissioner of Income Tax-1.. Appellant v/s.
M/s. Killick Nixon Ltd.
.. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the applicant / orig. appellant None for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
DATED : 23[rd] DECEMBER, 2016.
P.C.
1.None appears for the respondent assessee. Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant Revenue states that the respondent assessee has been served. He undertakes to file affidavit-in-service within a period of one week from today.
2.The present motion seeks condonation of 3 days delay in filing the accompany appeal from the order dated 30[th] November, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
3.We have perused the affidavit in support and are satisfied with the reasons explaining the 3 days delay in filing the appeal.
4.Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
5.Time is granted to the applicant Revenue to remove office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today. It is made clear that if the Office objections are not removed within 4 weeks, the appeal itself would stand dismissed without any reference to the Court.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.