Nma/2902/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Pune v. Late Smt. Shantabai B. Gandhi, Ahmednagar
High Court
07 Feb 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/2902/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Pune v. Late Smt. Shantabai B. Gandhi, Ahmednagar
Date of order
07 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nma/2902/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Pune v. Late Smt. Shantabai B. Gandhi, Ahmednagar, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2902 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.869 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Punei
..Appellant.
V/s.
Late Smt. Shantabai B. Gandhi
..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.DATED : 7TH FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the Revenue. None for the respondent, though duly served. Learned counsel for the Revenue undertakes to file affidavit of service during the course of the day. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, the delay of 2 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.