Nma/291/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Voltas Limited
High Court
17 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/291/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Voltas Limited
Date of order
17 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Nma/291/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Voltas Limited, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.291 OF 2006ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.73 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.291 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.73 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Voltas Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.A.D. Kango for appellant.
Mr.Nishant Thakkar with Rajesh Puraji for respondent.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
The respondents have been served. There is
a delay of 262 days in filing the appeal. Mrs.Padma
Divakar has filed an affidavit in support of the Motion
for delay. From the affidavit it is clear that major
delay had occasioned on account of the file pending in
the Ministry of Law till 29/4/2005 and subsequent
thereto on account of non availability of stamp papers.
There is no affidavit filed opposing the contentions of
the appellant.
2. Considering the above, in our opinion, the
- = : 2 : = -
cause shown amounts to sufficient cause. The tax
incidence is also very high. Hence delay is condoned.
Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
Office to register the appeal.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.