Case Law › High Court › Nma/2974/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Nma/2974/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 Mumbai v. M/S. Fortune Steel Industries

High Court 15 Feb 2011 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

15 Feb 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Nma/2974/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-18 Mumbai v. M/S. Fortune Steel Industries, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2974 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6764 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-18 ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Fortune Steel Industries ..Respondent. Mr. A.S. Shivsharan for appellant. Ms V.B. Patel for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.DATED : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2011 P.C. :- 1.By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b). 2.Notice of Motion is disposed off with no order as to costs. (MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.