In Nma/2985/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 17 Mumbai v. Devkumar Agarwal, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2984 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5736 OF 2010 ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2985 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5735 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-17
..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Devkumar Agarwal
..Respondent.
Mr. D.K. Kamwal for appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.DATED : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C. :-
1.By consent, Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.Both the Notice of Motion are disposed off with no order as
to costs.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue