Nma/3004/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 16, Mumbai v. M/S. Champion Construction Co
High Court
04 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nma/3004/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 16, Mumbai v. M/S. Champion Construction Co
Date of order
04 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nma/3004/2006 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax 16, Mumbai v. M/S. Champion Construction Co, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3004 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1600 OF 2006
Commissioner of Income-tax-16 ..Appellant
V/s.
Champion Construction Company ..Respondents
----
Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 11.02.2008
PC
1. This is a Motion for condoning 226 days delay in
filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the
affidavit in support indicates that the Chief
Commissioner of Income-tax granted approval for
filing appeal on 16.12.2005. Thereafter the entire
case papers were sent to the panel Counsel for
preparing the appeal memo. It is not mentioned in
the affidavit as to when draft appeal memo was
received back. The appeal ultimately came to be
filed on 25.8.2006. In our view, the events which
occured between these 2 dates have not been
mentioned in the affidavit-in-support. In the
circumstances, cause shown does not amount to
sufficient cause. Hence, Notice of Motion
dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1600 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1600 OF 2006
. As the motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.